History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mills v. Johnson
215 U.S. 590
SCOTUS
1909
Check Treatment

215 U.S. 590

30 S.Ct. 407

54 L.Ed. 340

MRS. EMMA G. MILLS, and her husband, Harry Mills, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MRS. M. E. V. JOHNSON and husband, L. A. Johnson, J. H. H. Burk, at al.

No. 36.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 13, 1909

Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and R. S. Neblett for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Richard Mays, Robert E. Prince, and W. S. Simpkins for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

1

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Beale v. Johnson, 45 Tex. Civ. App. 119, 99 S. W. 1045; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 86, 53 L. ed. 417, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220; Waters Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 53 L. ed. 431, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, 53 L. ed. 269, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; Cox v. Texas, 202 U. S. 446, 50 L. ed. 1099, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 671; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 49 L. ed. 394, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 176; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U. S. 405, 48 L. ed. 239, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 148.

Case Details

Case Name: Mills v. Johnson
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 13, 1909
Citation: 215 U.S. 590
Docket Number: 36
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.