midpage

Mills v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Mills v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 27, 1965
No. 34238
Versions:
PER CURIAM.

Upon the filing of the petition for certi-orari in this case there was an apparent conflict between the decision of the District Court of Appeal and decisions of this court and other District Courts of Appeal so the matter was set for argument on jurisdiction and merits.

After hearing the arguments for petitioner and respondents and making an intensive study of the record and briefs, we now conclude that no such conflict exists as to vest jurisdiction in this court under *347Sec. 4, Art. V of the Constitution, F.S.A., so the petition for certiorari is—

Denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mills v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Oct 27, 1965
Citations: 179 So. 2d 346; 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2914; No. 34238
Docket Number: No. 34238
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
Log In