History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mills v. Griswold
1 Root 383
Conn.
1792
Check Treatment
By the Court.

The distinction is, where the communications are necessary in the course of business, as of a client to his attorney, he may not disclose them, but where the communications are voluntary, as in the present case, his oath obliges The witness to tell the whole truth.

Case Details

Case Name: Mills v. Griswold
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: May 15, 1792
Citation: 1 Root 383
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
    Mills v. Griswold, 1 Root 383