79 Mo. App. 393 | Mo. Ct. App. | 1899
This is an action to recover damages for injuries to four head of cattle. The injury happened on a
The evidence adduced by the defendant was contradictory of that of the plaintiff’s witnesses. The case was one for the jury whose verdict is conclusive on us. There is no such preponderance of the evidence in favor of the defendant, on the issues in the case, as would justify any interference by us with the judgment.
"While the case on its facts was -a very close one, we discover no error in the record calling for a reversal of the judgment, which must accordingly be affirmed.