Miller's Administrator v. Young
17 F. Cas. 365 | U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia | 1812
however,
had made up their opinion, that the statute against pretensed titles did not vacate the deed; and that the agreement to settle the account, being executed by a deed with general warranty, which was accepted by the plaintiff, the transaction was closed and could not be disaffirmed; and that the plaintiff must resort to his warranty..
