Miller v. Town of Montclair

93 N.J.L. 472 | N.J. | 1919

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Kaliscii, Black, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 11.

.For reversal — None,