midpage

Miller v. StateMiller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Dec 18, 2002
No. 3D02-716
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Cope
PER CURIAM.

Because, as the state concedes, the trial judge should have excused a particular juror for cause, Chavers v. State, 827 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Polite v. State, 754 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), and the defendant properly preserved the error in accordance with Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 876, 118 S.Ct. 197, 139 L.Ed.2d 134 (1997); see Wilson v. State, 753 So.2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review denied, 773 So.2d 59 (Fla.2000), the judgment below is reversed for a new trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Miller v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 18, 2002
Citations: 840 So. 2d 263; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18565; 2002 WL 31828764; No. 3D02-716
Docket Number: No. 3D02-716
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In