Miller v. State, 8 Div. 905.

8 Div. 905. | Ala. Ct. App. | Apr 3, 1923

The indictment in both counts follows the statute, and is sufficient.

We have several times held that the Volstead Act (41 Stat. 305) does not supersede the state laws prohibiting the manufacture of whisky. Mary Banks v. State, 207 Ala. 179" date_filed="1921-06-30" court="Ala." case_name="Banks v. State">207 Ala. 179,93 So. 293" date_filed="1921-06-30" court="Ala." case_name="Banks v. State">93 So. 293.

The exceptions reserved to the introduction of evidence are without merit.

We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.