History
  • No items yet
midpage
Miller v. State
96 So. 718
Ala. Ct. App.
1923
Check Treatment

The indictment in both counts follows the statute, and is sufficient.

We have several times held that the Volstead Act (41 Stat. 305) does not supersede the state laws prohibiting the manufacture of whisky. Mary Banks v. State, 207 Ala. 179,93 So. 293.

The exceptions reserved to the introduction of evidence are without merit.

We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Miller v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 3, 1923
Citation: 96 So. 718
Docket Number: 8 Div. 905.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.