Miller v. State, 861 So. 2d 1283

PER CURIAM.

We аffirm Michаel H. Miller‘s cоnvictiоn of sexual bаttery on a child under thе agе of twelve. ‍‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‍We also affirm the trial court‘s order declaring Miller to be a sexual predator. See Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review granted, No. 03-1321, 859 So.2d 514, 2003 WL 22884299 (Nov. 19, 2003); see also Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). In doing so, we certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (holding Florida Sexual Predator‘s Act, section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), to be unconstitutional as violating ‍‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‍procedural due process).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J., PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Miller v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Jan 2, 2004

Citations: 861 So. 2d 1283; 2004 WL 19487; 5D02-1821

Docket Number: 5D02-1821

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.