Miller v. SavageMiller v. Savage
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ferradino, J.), entered April 19, 1996 in Fulton County, which granted a motion made by defendant Sir William Johnson Volunteer Fire Company,
On February 27, 1993, plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident when the vehicle which he was operating was struck head-on by a vehicle driven by defendant Christopher P. Savage. At the time of the accident, Savage was traveling on County Highway 131 in the Town of Johnstown, Fulton County, and was responding to a fire alarm in the course of his duties as a volunteer firefighter for defendant Sir William Johnson Volunteer Fire Company, Inc. (hereinafter the Fire Company). Thereafter, plaintiff commenced this personal injury action against, inter alia, the Fire Company. Following joinder of issue, the Fire Company moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it on the ground that it was not a proper party to the action. Supreme Court granted the motion and this appeal by plaintiff ensued.
There must be an affirmance. Pursuant to Town Law § 170, a town may establish either a fire district, a fire protection district or a fire alarm district for the purpose of providing fire protection services within its boundaries. The Town of Johns-town chose to establish a fire protection district known as the Sir William Johnson Fire Protection District (see, Town Law § 184 [1]). Unlike a fire district, a fire protection district is not a political subdivision independent of the Town (see, Nelson v Garcia,
In the case at hand, the Town contracted with the Fire Company to provide fire protection services within the Sir William Johnson Fire Protection District. The Fire Company was incorporated pursuant to Not-for-Profit Corporation Law § 1402 and, as such, the Town retained complete control over the Fire Company and ultimate responsibility for fire protection (see, Not-for-Profit Corporation Law § 1402 [e]; Miller v Morania Oil,
White, J. P., Casey, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.