History
  • No items yet
midpage
Miller v. Rhay
384 U.S. 892
SCOTUS
1966
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Washington and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion to remand is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of its opinion in Dillenburg v. Maxwell, — Wash. 2d —, 413 P. 2d 940.

Case Details

Case Name: Miller v. Rhay
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 23, 1966
Citation: 384 U.S. 892
Docket Number: 1180
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.