History
  • No items yet
midpage
Miller v. Miller
146 So. 893
La.
1933
Check Treatment

This is a proceeding for a divorce on the ground of adultery. The defense is a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, resting on the ground that the matrimonial domicile of the parties is not in the state of Louisiana, but in the state of Oklahoma, where both parties reside, a denial of the adultery, and averments of adultery on the part of plaintiff. There was judgment below overruling the exception *Page 812 to the jurisdiction, and granting plaintiff the divorce, and the permanent custody of the minor issue of the marriage.

Plaintiff alone has filed a brief. The evidence adduced leaves no doubt that plaintiff, who was interested in the show, known as the Miller Bros. 101 Ranch, soon after his marriage with defendant, located in Catahoula parish with the intention of residing there permanently, that parish becoming the matrimonial domicile. It has remained the matrimonial domicile ever since. The exception to the jurisdiction was overruled properly.

On the merits of the case, the evidence fully establishes the adultery charged by plaintiff. Defendant offered no evidence on the trial of the merits. Therefore, there is no evidence to establish adultery on the part of plaintiff.

The judgment is affirmed.

ST. PAUL, J., absent on account of illness, takes no part.

Case Details

Case Name: Miller v. Miller
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Feb 27, 1933
Citation: 146 So. 893
Docket Number: No. 31216.
Court Abbreviation: La.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.