ALLEN B. MILLER ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ELBERT MELLOTT ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.
Case No. 18 MO 0004
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MONROE COUNTY
January 24, 2020
[Cite as Miller v. Mellot, 2020-Ohio-237.]
Motion for Reconsideration
BEFORE:
David A. D‘Apolito, Cheryl L. Waite, Carol Ann Robb, Judges.
JUDGMENT:
Denied.
Atty. Kristopher Justice, and Atty. Daniel Corcoran, Theisen Brock, 424 Second Street, Marietta, Ohio 45750, for Plaintiffs- Appellants and
Atty. Scott Eickelberger, Atty. David Tarbert, and Atty. Ryan Linn, Kincaid, Taylor, & Geyer, 50 North Fourth Street, P.O. Box 1030, Zanesville, Ohio 43702, for Defendants- Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
{1} On October 9, 2019, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Allen B. Miller, Matilda J. Miller, Craig M. Miller, Tina E. Miller, Brenda D. Thomas, and Kevin M. Thomas filed a second application for reconsideration pursuant to
{2} An application for reconsideration must call to the attention of the appellate court an obvious error in its decision or point to an issue that was raised to the court but was inadvertently either not considered at all or not fully considered. Juhasz v. Costanzo, 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 99-C.A.-294, 2002 WL 206417, (Feb. 1, 2002). In our September 30th judgment entry, we explained that the void in the post-severance/pre-root deed history in the record prohibited us from concluding that an exception in the root of title deed was a general reference to an interest created in a prior deed.
{3} We have previous recognized that
Case No. 18 MO 0004
JUDGE DAVID A. D‘APOLITO
JUDGE CHERYL L. WAITE
JUDGE CAROL ANN ROBB
NOTICE TO COUNSEL
This document constitutes a final judgment entry.
Case No. 18 MO 0004