History
  • No items yet
midpage
Miller v. Kratts
202 A.D. 785
N.Y. App. Div.
1922
Check Treatment

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, upon condition that the defendant shall, within ten days, pay to plaintiff the disbursements as taxed in the judgment and ten dollars costs, otherwise the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Held, on its face the contract was not a conditional sale of the cows mentioned therein. (See Pers. Prop. Law, §§ 60, 82, 92, 100;* Sanitary Carpet Cleaner v. Reed Mfg. Co., 159 App. Div. 587.) All concur.

As to section 60 see Laws of 1922, chap. 642, repealing Pers. Prop. Law, art. 4, and adding thereto new art. 4, known as Uniform Conditional Sales Act, in effect September 1, 1922. Other sections cited were added by Laws of 1911, chap. 571, known as Sales of Goods Act. — [Rep.

Case Details

Case Name: Miller v. Kratts
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1922
Citation: 202 A.D. 785
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.