Miller v. I. P. Thomas & Son Co.

89 N.J.L. 364 | N.J. | 1916

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenci-iard, Parker,o Minturn, Nalisch, Black, White, Ter-HUNE, HEPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, JJ. 13.

For reversal—None.

midpage