Miller v. Headley

Jan 5, 1933
Versions:163 A. 665
112 N.J. Eq. 89
1933 N.J. LEXIS 922
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 436.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — Hone.