History
  • No items yet
midpage
Miller v. Gorman
1839 Ind. LEXIS 36
Ind.
1839
Check Treatment

THE defendant moved the Court to instruct the jury that if certain facts were proved, they should be considered in mitigation of damages. The instruction was refused. Held, that as the record did not show that there was any evidence to support the hypothetical instruction asked for, the Court would presume the instruction to have been irrelevant to the testimony, and, of course, rightly refused.

Case Details

Case Name: Miller v. Gorman
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 24, 1839
Citation: 1839 Ind. LEXIS 36
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.