History
  • No items yet
midpage
Miller v. Garling
12 How. Pr. 203
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1856
Check Treatment
Balcom, Justice,

overruled the objection, and gave the plaintiff leave to amend his complaint on the trial, by inserting a claim for such special damages. (Bennett agt. Lockwood, 20 Wend. 223.)

The defendant’s counsel objected to the amendment, and claimed the defendant was not then prepared to meet such evidence. The judge remarked that the defendant must show he had some absent witness material to the claim for the special damages, before he would refuse to allow the plaintiff to amend his complaint, but no such proof was made, and the amendment was allowed without terms.

Case Details

Case Name: Miller v. Garling
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 15, 1856
Citation: 12 How. Pr. 203
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.