Milledgeville Oil Mills v. Wilkinson
134 Ga. 840 | Ga. | 1910
1. The plaintiffs petition as amended was sufficient to withstand the demurrers filed by the defendant, and the court below did not err in overruling them.
2. While there were some slight inaccuracies in the court’s chax’ge upoxx the subject of the xnortality and annuity tables introduced iix evidence, they were not of such a nature as to require the graiit of a new trial.
3. The charge of the court as a whole was full, fail-, and complete; and no material error appears in the excerpts of the chax’ge which ax’e attacked as erroxxeous in the motion for a new trial.
4. No error appears iix the other rulings complained of, and there was sufficient evidence _ to support the ve.rdict.
Judgment affirmed.