Miles v. StateMiles v. State
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Long, McMillan, Cobb, Baschab, Fry
The petitioner, Bobby Gene Miles, appeals the denial of his petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to
Miles in his “standing notice of appeal” stated:
“Pursuant to attached petition for postconviction relief by
Rule 32 A.R.Cr.P. remedy petitioner hereby submits a `Standing Notice of Appeal.’“Comes `Bobby Gene Miles’ the pro-se petitioner, and hereby makes known that he wishes to appeal to the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals any denial, dismissal or adverse ruling by this court for the attached petition for postconviction relief by way of
Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P. remedy. Appeal in this cause is authorized byRules 3 -4 Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure andRule 32.10 Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure .
Appellate Forms: A.R.A.P. 26 front-back and A.R.A.P. 1-C are attached hereto.”
This Court has never had occasion to speak to the specific issue presented in this case. However, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals in McCoy v. Garren, 384 So.2d 1113, 1114-15 (Ala.Civ.App. 1980) has stated the following concerning a premature notice of appeal:
“Appeals are of statutory origin, and, unless so provided, no appeal will lie. Johnson v. Barnes, 250 Ala. 292, 34 So.2d 144 (1948). . . .
”
Section 18-1-20, Code of Alabama 1975 is the only provision in the Code authorizing appeals from condemnation orders entered by probate courts. State v. Pettis, 275 Ala. 450, 156 So.2d 137 (1963). Therefore, the probate court order of November 27, 1978, not the September 22, 1978 order, was the order that triggered the running of the thirty day appeal period for appeals to the circuit court. Consequently defendants’ notice of appeal, which was filed on November 8, 1978, was filed before the order of condemnation from which an appeal could be taken. The result is a premature taking of an appeal.“Defendants’ failure to perfect their appeal in accordance with
§ 18-1-20 deprives the circuit court of jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Stanton v. Monroe County, 261 Ala. 61, 72 So.2d 854 (1954). Not having jurisdiction to hear defendants’ appeal, the circuit court properly dismissed it. State v. King, 271 Ala. 16, 122 So.2d 158 (1960).”
Followed by Ex parte City of Irondale, 686 So.2d 1127 (Ala. 1996). See also Jenkins v. Jenkins, 112 Md. App. 390, 685 A.2d 817 (1996) (“Premature notices of appeal are generally of no force and effect. . . .They have no effect because premature appeals are a jurisdictional defect. . . . We may not confer appellate jurisdiction on our own initiative.“).
Clearly, the wording of the Rule states that notice of appeal must be filed within 42 days “after a judgment” has been entered in a case. There is nothing from which to appeal until a ruling has been entered in a case. When Miles filed his notice of appeal there was no judgment entered on the Rule 32 petition.
We suggest that when a district or circuit court clerk receives a postconviction petition that is accompanied by a premature notice of appeal, that the clerk return the notice of appeal so that the petitioner is placed on notice that he/she will have to submit a written1 notice of appeal to the circuit clerk when a judgment is made on the petition.
Here, the “standing notice of appeal” filed prior to the entry of judgment
For the foregoing reasons this case is due to be dismissed.
APPEAL DISMISSED. Long, P.J., and McMillan, Cobb, Baschab, and Fry, JJ., concur.