Milan v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs
421 Fed. Appx. 967
Fed. Cir.
2011
Check Treatment
Docket

William C. RICKETT, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2010-7093.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 25, 2011.

967

The appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Veterans Claims more than 120 days after the Board of Veterans’ Appeals mailed its decision in his case. That court dismissed the appeal as untimely, concluding that the 120-day appeal period established by 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a) for seeking review of Board of Veterans’ Appeals decisions is jurisdictional and not subject to equitable tolling. The appellant sought this court‘s review.

This court stayed the briefing schedule in this appeal pending the United States Supreme Court‘s review of our decision in (en banc) (affirming Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims determination that period to appeal to that court is not subject to equitable tolling). In , the Supreme Court reversed this court‘s decision and concluded that the 120-day deadline for filing an appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims does not have jurisdictional consequences. Because the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims erred in concluding that the appeal deadline established by § 7266(a) is jurisdictional, we vacate the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

  1. The motion is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
  2. All sides shall bear their own costs.

Leon W. SHAPIRO, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2010-7029.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 25, 2011.

968

Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and O‘MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

RADER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

The appellant moves without opposition to vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and to remand for further proceedings.

The appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Veterans Claims more than 120 days after the Board of Veterans’ Appeals mailed its decision in his case. That court dismissed the appeal as untimely, concluding that the 120-day appeal period established by 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a) for seeking review of Board of Veterans’ Appeals decisions is jurisdictional and not subject to equitable tolling. The appellant sought this court‘s review.

This court stayed the briefing schedule in this appeal pending the United States Supreme Court‘s review of our decision in (en banc) (affirming Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims determination that period to appeal to that court is not subject to equitable tolling). In , the Supreme Court reversed this court‘s decision and concluded that the 120-day deadline for filing an appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims does not have jurisdictional consequences. Because the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims erred in concluding that the appeal deadline established by § 7266(a) is jurisdictional, we vacate the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

  1. The motion is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
  2. All sides shall bear their own costs.