History
  • No items yet
midpage
Miko Bros. v. Lucas
169 Conn. 641
Conn.
1975
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s tort complaint. The judgment is dated January 3, 1974. The record discloses that the defendant died, and his death was suggested on the record, April 16, 1973. No administrator or executor has been substituted for the deceased defendant pursuant to the provisions of § 52-599 of the General Statutes. The appeal accordingly is dismissed on the authority of Boucher Agency, Inc. v. Zimmer, 160 Conn. 404, 407, 279 A.2d 540, and Barton v. New Haven, 74 Conn. 729, 730, 52 A. 403.

The appeal is dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Miko Bros. v. Lucas
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Nov 25, 1975
Citation: 169 Conn. 641
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.