History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mikell v. The Cutting Edge Elite Inc.
1:15-cv-07273
S.D.N.Y.
Oct 20, 2016
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 1:15-cv-07273-LTS-JCF Document 32 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-------------------------------------------------------x

LAMONT MIKELL,

Plaintiff, -v- No. 15-cv-7273-LTS-JCF THE CUTTING EDGE ELITE INC. and

JEREMY WALDON,

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------x

O RDER

Plaintiff Lamont Mikell (“Plaintiff”) has moved to amend the complaint to add Luis Mendieta and Nathan Perry as defendants. (Docket Entry No. 15.) Defendants The Cutting Edge Elite, Inc. and Jeremy Waldon (collectively, “Defendants”) oppose the motion and have moved to dismiss the complaint as against Jeremy Waldon. (Docket Entry No. 17.) On September 28, 2016, Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV issued a Report and Recommendation to this Court (the “Report”), recommending that the plaintiff’s motion be denied and the defendants’ motion be granted. (Docket Entry No. 31.) Any objections to the Report were due by October 17, 2016. (Id.) No objections to the Report have been filed by either party.

When reviewing a report and recommendation, the Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C.S. § 636(b)(1) (C) (LexisNexis 2016). “To accept the report and recommendation of a magistrate, to which no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Wilds v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 262 O RDER A DOPTING R&R. WPD V ERSION 10/20/16 [1]

Case 1:15-cv-07273-LTS-JCF Document 32 Filed 10/20/16 Page 2 of 2 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).

Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Francis’ well-reasoned Report, to which no objection has been made, the Court finds no clear error. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint to add Luis Mendieta and Nathan Perry as defendants is denied and the Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as against Jeremy Waldon is granted. This Order resolves docket entry number 15, 17, and 31.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York

October 20, 2016

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN United States District Judge Copy Mailed To:

Mr. Lamont Mikell

170-12 130th Avenue

Apartment 2G

Jamaica, NY 11434

O RDER A DOPTING R&R. WPD V ERSION 10/20/16 [2]

Case Details

Case Name: Mikell v. The Cutting Edge Elite Inc.
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Oct 20, 2016
Docket Number: 1:15-cv-07273
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.