History
  • No items yet
midpage
Midberry v. Collins
9 Johns. 345
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1812
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The fact stated in the return of the two judges, that the bill of exceptions was not tendered at the trial, but presented to the judges individually, after the term had ended, is sufficient cause for denying the present motion. The facts attending a trial are extremely liable to be mistaken or forgotten, if they are not reduced to writing at the time, and presented distinctly to the court during the continuance of the term. A s this bill was not tendered until the subsequent vacation, we will not now award process to compel the judges to sign it. The reasons upon which the court refused to grant a like motion, in the case of Sikes v Ransom, (6 Johns. Rep. 279.) apply to this case.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Midberry v. Collins
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1812
Citation: 9 Johns. 345
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.