Case Information
*1 Case 2:24-cv-00326-JPH-MJD Document 122 Filed 05/28/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 678
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION MID CENTRAL OPERATING ENGINEERS )
HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, et al., )
) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 2:24-cv-00326-JPH-MJD ) HOOSIERVAC LLC, )
) Defendant. ) ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Reconsider the Court’s Denial of Motion to Transfer. [Dkt. 64.] A motion to reconsider "is not an appropriate forum for rehashing previously rejected arguments or arguing matters that could have been heard during the pendency of the previous motion." Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole v. CBI Indus., Inc. , 90 F.3d 1264, 1269-70 (7th Cir. 1996) (citation omitted). The movant "must demonstrate a manifest error of law or fact or present newly discovered evidence." Lightspeed Media Corp. v. Smith , 830 F.3d 500, 505-06 (7th Cir. 2016) (quotation and citation omitted). Defendant has demonstrated no such error of law or fact. Defendant has once again identified no procedural mechanism by which a pending NLRB proceeding can be "transferred" to this court. Accordingly, Defendant's motion to reconsider is DENIED .
SO ORDERED.
Dated: 28 MAY 2025 *2 Case 2:24-cv-00326-JPH-MJD Document 122 Filed 05/28/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
679
Distribution:
Service will be made electronically on all
ECF-registered counsel of record via email
generated by the Court's ECF system.
2