History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mickelson v. Bennett
249 N.W.2d 719
Minn.
1977
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding to determine eligibility for certain unemployment benefits. The commissioner of employment services determined that claimant was eligible for the benefits and that the relator’s experience-rating account was chargeable therefor. The essence of the finding of the commissioner was that the claimant was “involuntarily separated from his employment.”

On appeal, both parties agree that the principal question presented is which of two entities was claimant’s employer within the meaning of the Employment Services Law, Minn.St. c. 268. Because this purely factual question has not been decided by the fact-finder, we have decided that this case must be remanded to the commissioner for such a determination, and for whatever conclusion may result once that fact is determined.

Remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Mickelson v. Bennett
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jan 14, 1977
Citation: 249 N.W.2d 719
Docket Number: No. 46389
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.