History
  • No items yet
midpage
Michener v. Michener
1 Sadler 391
Pa.
1886
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

There was no error in rejecting the evidence. It was wholly insufficient to rebut the presumption of payment. It indicates a desire to have the mortgage satisfied of record, but not an admission that it was unpaid. We discover no error in the charge, nor in directing the jury to render a verdict in favor of the defendants. The other specifications of error have no merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Michener v. Michener
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 25, 1886
Citation: 1 Sadler 391
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.