History
  • No items yet
midpage
Michelle Riddick v. Kaiser Permanente
669 F. App'x 635
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michelle Riddick, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Michelle Riddick appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice for failure to effectuate service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Riddick’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Riddick has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Michelle Riddick v. Kaiser Permanente
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 17, 2016
Citation: 669 F. App'x 635
Docket Number: 16-1917
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.