History
  • No items yet
midpage
Michael v. Greenberg
116 A. 923
Conn.
1922
Check Treatment

The appeal is confined to a correction of the finding. The first eight assignments of error do not follow our practice; the last six assignments, while not in the most approved form, cannot be said to be void assignments. We have examined the evidence and find no one of the assignments well taken, assuming all were in due form. The appeal seems to us to present no reviewable question.

There is no error.

Case Details

Case Name: Michael v. Greenberg
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Feb 21, 1922
Citation: 116 A. 923
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.