13202_1 | 9th Cir. | Dec 13, 1951
Concurrence Opinion
(concurring).
I have joined in this .order because I am convinced that Judge Denman’s order of August 23, 1951, Ex parte Cohen, 9 Cir., 191 F.2d 300" court="9th Cir." date_filed="1951-08-23" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/ex-parte-cohen-227762?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="227762">191 F.2d 300, was right. I think it was right for an additional reason, not therein stated, which is that § 1001 of 18 U.S.C. became effective September 1, 1948, as of which date Title 18 was “enacted into positive law” by chapter 645 of the Laws of the 80th Congress, 2nd Session, approved June 25, 1948. It is inconceivable to me that this section could be deemed “repealed” by any section of the Internal Revenue Code which was enacted February 10, 1939.
As I think the question discussed in Judge Denman’s order is not a substantial one which should be determined by this court, and as I observe no other substantial question in the case, I think bail must he denied.
I join in the order for the reasons stated by Judge POPE in his concurrence.
I join in the order on the showing made by the very limited portion of the record
Lead Opinion
The order made by Chief Judge William Denman on November 27, 1951, admitting appellant to bail in the- sum of $5,000, is hereby vacated.
CLIFTON MATHEWS
WILLIAM HEALY
HOMER T. BONE
WALTER L. POPE
United States Circuit Judges.