Case Information
*1
Respond to: Michael Jude:Prie, save protestate, esse General Delivery Burnet Post Office Burget, Texas
FILED
April 20, 2015 Third Court of Appeals Jeffrey D. Kyle Clerk
Michael Jude: Pirie, save protestate esse, demandent (case No. 03-15-00210-CF)
In the Court of Appeals Third Supreme, District Sitting in Austin, Texas.
The State of Texas
Motion of Declaration
I. Michael Jude:Prie, save protestate esse.
*2 pursuant to the Holy Bible, the first, the second, the fourth, the fifth, the sixth, the ninth and the tenth at amendments and all due process guaranteed in the Constitution of the United States and Article One Section nine of the Texas Constitution, to show the following declarations. One. This matter, case No. 05-15-001e ck. dismissal for want of jurisdiction is exactly the initial cause I presented to the third district count of promet county, Texas with a hand delivered Non-statutory abatement to the presiding judge. This occurred after the first day of the ninth month in the Year of Our Lord and Saviour.
*3 Jesus, the Christ, two thousand fourteen, pertaining to cause No. 40535. This abatement allowed ten days for the State of Texas to answer with written evidence or request for a continuance of time in this matter. There was no response to this challenge to standing. The third time I was brought before the third-third district court I verbally declared into the record that the State of Texas was in default for want of response, therefore it had no standing in the above mentioned cause.
Two.
Background
*4 When the returned with a verdict of guilty, I then and there reajusted a conference with my standby counsel to discuss the matter of a still pending change that I intended to contest or offer a plea margin to a lesser degree to resolve this. I was trying assess the situation and know what
*5 and there was a punishment for it to come; two; I was offering to make a plea bargin for a second pending case. My assumption and understanding of our conversation at this time was only about the pending charge and resolving the deposition of that charge. at the conclusion of this offer my understanding was the second charge would run concurrently with the evading. I believed that what is called the judicial-ridget confession pertained only to the failure to appear charge. I did not notice that the papers I was initiating had anything at all to do with the evading charge or my future right to appeal. There was mention
*6 nothing about any effect on the evading charge. I did not read any of the papers before signing. I was under the assumption from talking with my standby counsel that they only concerned the plea on the remaining charge.
Three.
Can I declare naught into existence merely by my declaration, nor can I declare the truth to be naught. Therefore a crime not committed can never be a crime and innocence can not be changed to guilt. by any amount of declaration and unsunderstanding. Truth, justice and the American way.
*7 To the Horanable Judge of said Court Prayer
Wherefore I michael Judo: Pirie, suceprotestate ese, prays the Court grant this motion of declaration for lack of Standip andtestinonial proof of committing the original allogge ofrense.
The suteenth day of the fourth month in the fear of Our Lord and Saviour Jeses, the Chist, two thousandstteen Dare
Michael Bud: Jais Demandent's Signture
Granted Dened
Date Judge's signature
*8