32:T546,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Michael Jenkins v. Warden Rivera, 12-6987","datePublished":"2012-07-26","legislationDate":"2012-07-26","citation":"Michael Jenkins v. Warden Rivera, No. 12-6987 (4th Cir. Jul 26, 2012)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","description":"Read the full text of Michael Jenkins v. Warden Rivera (Michael Jenkins v. Warden Rivera, No. 12-6987 (4th Cir. Jul 26, 2012)). This legal opinion, filed in 2012-07-26, from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/michael-jenkins-v-warden-rivera--805278"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/michael-jenkins-v-warden-rivera--805278","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Michael Jenkins v. Warden Rivera, Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Michael Jenkins v. Warden Rivera, No. 12-6987 (4th Cir. Jul 26, 2012)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T53a,

*1 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Anthony Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Jenkins, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Jenkins’ 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jenkins v. Rivera, No. 4:12-cv-00938-CMC (D.S.C. May 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED