History
  • No items yet
midpage
Michael James Decca, John Anton Slack and Howard Nelson Zinram v. United States
346 F.2d 158
5th Cir.
1965
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM:

Only Decca has prosecuted his appeal in this case. The appeals of Slack and Zinram are dismissed for want of prosecution.

The judgment of conviction and sentence of Decca are affirmed. The search complained of on the motion to suppress *159 evidence was a “border search,” and as such was legal. See Murgia v. United States, 9 Cir., 285 F.2d 14, cert. denied 366 U.S. 977, 81 S.Ct. 1946, 6 L.Ed.2d 1265, and Mansfield v. United States, 5 Cir., 308 F.2d 221.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Michael James Decca, John Anton Slack and Howard Nelson Zinram v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 1, 1965
Citation: 346 F.2d 158
Docket Number: 21974
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.