Michael G. Naessens v. Bank of America, N.A.
2:25-cv-01079
D. Nev.
Sep 24, 2025
Check Treatment
Docket

Michael G. Naessens, Plaintiff(s), v. Bank of America, N.A., Defendant(s).

Case No. 2:25-cv-01079-RFB-NJK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

September 24, 2025

Order [Docket No. 66]

On June 23, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff‘s motion to file electronically. Docket No. 6 at 2. Pending before the Court now is Plaintiff‘s motion to “enforce” that prior order. Docket No. 66. The motion accuses the Clerk‘s Office of failing to correct issues with his CM/ECF account or to correct clerical errors on the docket. See id. at 2. Plaintiff indicates that “[t]hese problems are purely clerical.” Id. At bottom, the motion asks for judicial intervention to “direct the Clerk” to make corrections. See id. at 3. The motion identifies no legal authority in support of that relief and the types of issues identified fall within the province of the Clerk‘s Office. See, e.g., Local Rule IC 1-1(a), (e), (g). The Court is not persuaded that judicial intervention is warranted, so Plaintiff‘s motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 24, 2025

Nancy J. Koppe

United States Magistrate Judge