Meyers v. Young

270 A.D. 800 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1946

Order reversed on the law and facts and as a matter of discretion, with $10 costs and disbursements, and actions oi’dered to be tried together. (See Civ. Prae. Act, § 96-a; Crandall v. Leach é Co., Inc., 222 App. Div. 292; McAllister V. Drislane, 239 App. Div. 85; Olson v. Abbott, 267 App. Div. 1044.) All concur. (The order denies a motion of defendants Womeldorf and Young to consolidate two actions.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, MeCurn and Larkin, JJ.

midpage