History
  • No items yet
midpage
Meyers v. Young
270 A.D. 800
N.Y. App. Div.
1946
Check Treatment

Order reversed on the law and facts and as a matter of discretion, with $10 costs and disbursements, and actions oi’dered to be tried together. (See Civ. Prae. Act, § 96-a; Crandall v. Leach é Co., Inc., 222 App. Div. 292; McAllister V. Drislane, 239 App. Div. 85; Olson v. Abbott, 267 App. Div. 1044.) All concur. (The order denies a motion of defendants Womeldorf and Young to consolidate two actions.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, MeCurn and Larkin, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Meyers v. Young
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 18, 1946
Citation: 270 A.D. 800
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.