OPINION
Defendant-Appellant Diana Meyer appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee National City Bank.
We affirm.
Meyer presents three issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as two:
I. Whether the trial court erred in grаnting summary judgment for National City Bank.
II. Whether Weltman Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. properly represents National City Bank in this action.
In January 2007, National City Bank filed a complaint against Meyer to recover $20,817.47 that was due and owing on a credit card issued by National City Bank. In February 2007, Meyer filed a motion fоr summary judgment, and in March 2008, she filed a motion for dismissal. National City Bank filed a motion for summary judgment in May 2008, and in July 2008, the trial court granted National City Bank's motion and denied both of Meyer's motions. This appeal ensued.
Meyer first contends that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of National City Bank. Particularly, she asserts that National City Bank was not entitled to summary judgment because it did not provide evidencе of a signed contract and, secondly, because it did not provide a complete accounting to prove the bаlance due on the account. We will address each argument in turn.
On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, our standard of review is identical to that of the trial court: whether there exists a genuine issue of material fact and whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Winchell v. Guy,
Meyer claims that National City Bank is not entitled to summary judgment because it did not provide evidenсe of a signed contract. Meyer is correct that National City Bank did not produce a doe-ument signed by Meyer; however, Nаtional City Bank did submit other, sufficient evidence to show Meyer's agreement to be
*976
liable for charges incurred on the accоunt. Although we found no published cases in Indiana, we note with approval the determinations of other states that credit card agreements are contracts, and the issuance and use of a eredit card creates a legally binding agreement. Seе Bank One, Columbus, N.A. v. Palmer,
Mеyer also submits that the trial court should not have granted summary judgment in favor of National City Bank because National City Bank did not provide a complete history of transactions on the credit card account in order to prove the balance due. In support of its motion for summary judgment, National City Bank designated copies of the statement of account for the months ending April 14, 2005 through April 14, 2006. These monthly statements are addressed to Meyer and show charges and payments made to the account during that time рeriod. In addition, National City Bank submitted an affidavit of Jennifer Kasper, an agent of National City Bank who had access to and control over Meyer's account. She verified that the amount due on the account as of January 25, 2007 was $20,817.47 and that Meyer had dеfaulted on the terms of payment of the account. Meyer neither disputed receiving the account statements nor submitted еvidence of filing of timely disputes as required by the Agreement. See Credit Card Agreement, Appellant's App. at 183. Meyer tendered nо evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding the balance due on the account. Thus, therе being no genuine issue of material fact as to Meyer's consent to be bound by the Agreement and to the balance due and оwing on the account, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of National City Bank.
The second issue presented by Meyer is the propriety of the representation of National City Bank by Weltman *977 Weinberg & Reis, Co., L.P.A. Meyer peceu-liarly asserts that Weltman Weinberg & Rеis, Co., L.P.A. has never provided documentation that it represents National City Bank. To the contrary, the CCS (Chronological Case Summаry) shows an appearance by attorney for the plaintiff, National City Bank, on January 81, 2007. The CCS lists the attorney for the Plaintiff as Jeаnnette M. Conrad of Weltman, Weinberg & Reis, Co., L.P.A. Meyer's assertion is simply without merit.
Based upon the foregoing analysis and authorities, we conclude that the trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of National City Bank. We further conclude that Jeannettе M. Conrad of Weltman, Weinberg & Reis, Co., LP.A. was the attorney of record for National City Bank, as reflected in the CCS of the trial court.
Affirmed.