Metropolitan Steel Industries, Inc. v. Citnalta Construction Corp.Metropolitan Steel Industries, Inc. v. Citnalta Construction Corp.
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered on or about February 6, 2002, granting the motion of defendant Citnalta Construction Corp. (Citnalta) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, deemed, pursuant to CPLR 5501 (c), an appeal from the ensuing judgment, same court and Justice, entered on or about February 26, 2002, dismissing the complaint, the judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff’s breach of contract claim was properly dismissed since it is undisputed that the parties were aware that there would be no binding agreement until their execution of a written subcontract, which never occurred (see Scheck v Francis,
Nor was there any basis to sustain plaintiffs claim for recovery in quantum meruit since there is no triable issue as to whether plaintiff performed the services in question with any reasonable expectation of compensation (see Lehrer McGovern Bovis v New York Yankees,
We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.