History
  • No items yet
midpage
Methuen Co. v. Hayes
33 Me. 169
Me.
1851
Check Treatment
Howard, J., orally.

— The agency of Davis was lawfully proved. There was no evidence that it was a limited agency. In the absence of such evidence, the agency is to be considered a general one. Such an agency includes the authority to commence and prosecute suits.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Methuen Co. v. Hayes
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1851
Citation: 33 Me. 169
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.