midpage

Metcalf v. StateMetcalf v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 9, 1952
No. 25629
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Morrison
MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, four years.

No statement of facts accompanies ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‍the record.

Bill of Exception No. 1 is to the admission of testimony. There is no showing in the bill as to what the testimony com*576plained of ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‍was. The bill does not show that any objectionable testimony was admitted and, therefore, presents nothing for review. Tex. Dig. Crim. Law 1120(4).

Bill of Exception No. ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‍2 seeks to attack the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. We cannot pass upon such a bill without a statement of facts.

What ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‍we have said in discussing Bill of Exception No. 2 applies to Bill of Exception No. 3, wherein appellant complains of absence of corroboration of the ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‍accomplice’s testimony.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Metcalf v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jan 9, 1952
Citations: 244 S.W.2d 818; 156 Tex. Crim. 575; 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1436; No. 25629
Docket Number: No. 25629
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
Log In