midpage

Messino v. United StatesMessino v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 3, 1986
No. 86-48; No. 86-5114; No. 86-5120; No. 86-5277
Versions:

Lead Opinion

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 791 F. 2d 489.






Dissenting Opinion

Justice White,

dissenting.

The Courts of Appeals are divided over the kind of agreement necessary to support a conviction for so-called RICO conspiracy. In this case, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit acknowledged that there is “a clear division among the circuit courts that have considered the issue.” United States v. Neapolitan, 791 F. 2d 489, 494-495 (1986). I adhere to the view expressed in my dissent in Adams v. United States, 474 U. S. 971 (1985), that we should grant certiorari and resolve this conflict.

Case Details

Case Name: Messino v. United States
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 3, 1986
Citations: 93 L. Ed. 2d 371; 55 U.S.L.W. 3313; 1986 U.S. LEXIS 4609; 479 U.S. 939; 107 S. Ct. 421; No. 86-48; No. 86-5114; No. 86-5120; No. 86-5277
Docket Number: No. 86-48; No. 86-5114; No. 86-5120; No. 86-5277
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
Log In