720 N.Y.S.2d 13 | N.Y. App. Div. | 2001
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J), entered on or about August 10, 1999, which denied plaintiffs’ and counterclaim defendants’ motion to amend their pleadings to include a Statute of Limitations defense to defendants-respondents’ counterclaims and, upon such amendment, to dismiss those counterclaims, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of appellants dismissing defendants-respondents’ counterclaims. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about November 1, 1999, which denied plaintiffs and counterclaim defendants-appellants’ motion for re argument, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a non-appealable order.
Pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) leave to amend a pleading is to be freely given absent significant prejudice or surprise directly resulting from the delay. Defendants fail to assert any claim of prejudice. The fact that plaintiff and defendants on the counterclaim failed to assert a reasonable excuse for their delay is insufficient to prohibit them from amending their reply (Cameron v 1199 Hous. Corp., 208 AD2d 454). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.