History
  • No items yet
midpage
Messenger v. Messenger
18 Conn. App. 825
Conn. App. Ct.
1989
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We have carefully considered each of the defendant’s claims of error including a plenary review of the record, transcript and briefs of the parties. As the appellant, the defendant has the burden of showing that there was error in the judgment from which the appeal was taken. Janet v. Scarpetti, 17 Conn. App. 825, 552 A.2d 1225 (1989); Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co., 6 Conn. App. 513, 517, 506 A.2d 169 (1986); B. Holden & J. Daly, Connecticut Evidence § 60. After affording the claims of error the appropriate, scope of review, we conclude that the defendant has not met her burden.

There is no error.

Case Details

Case Name: Messenger v. Messenger
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Jun 1, 1989
Citation: 18 Conn. App. 825
Docket Number: 7204
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.