Mesick v. Polk
296 N.Y. 673
NY
1946
Check Treatment

Order reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, and question certified answered in the negative, on the ground that there was no duty upon a mere vendor to warn the ultimate purchaser against exposure of the capsule to heat. No opinion.

Concur: DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ. Dissenting: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ.