Merwin v. Merwin

Apr 24, 1947
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Chief-Justice
Per Curiam.

The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expi-essed in the opinion filed in the Court of Chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodinb, Donges, Colie, Wachbnfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, JJ. 10. For affirmance on the result — Heher, Eafferty, JJ. 2. For modification — McGeehan, J. 1,