History
  • No items yet
midpage
288 A.D.2d 476
N.Y. App. Div.
2001

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown, dated November 17, 1999, which denied the petitioner’s application for certain variances, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated September 21, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The determination to deny the petitioner’s application for area variances, on the ground that the application was really for use variances and that the petitioner failed to meet the criteria for such variances, was neither illegal, arbitrary and capricious, nor an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Natale v Duffy, 285 AD2d 554; Matter of Sullivan v Duffy, 283 AD2d 583). Ritter, J. P., H. Miller, Feuerstein and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Merritt v. Duffy
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 26, 2001
Citations: 288 A.D.2d 476; 732 N.Y.S.2d 907; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11415
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In