Merriman v. State

Apr 17, 1996
No. 95-734
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Cope
PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s conviction. However, we have ‍​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‍no alternative but to reverse the sentencing order and remand for reimposition of the ‍​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‍original agreed twenty-four-year habitual offender sentence. There is no provision in the Florida Rules ‍​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‍of Criminal Procedure for a trial court’s subsequent enhancement of a legal sentence that ‍​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‍it has imposed. Royal v. State, 389 So.2d 696, 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800.

Affirmed in ‍​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‍part; reversed in part; remanded with directions.