History
  • No items yet
midpage
Merrill v. Dearing
24 Minn. 179
Minn.
1877
Check Treatment
Gileillan, C. J.

Motion to affirm judgment under rules 11 and 14. In opposition, appellant shows a notice dismissing *180the appeal served upon the respondent and filed, with proof of service, with the clerk.

There is no statute or rule of court controlling the practice in relation to the dismissal or withdrawal of appeals to this court. Where there is no such statute ór rule of court we think that, if an appellate court has once got jurisdiction of a cause, it cannot be deprived of that jurisdiction, and the respondent of a decision, at the mere will of the appellant. He should make application to the court for leave to dismiss. A mere notice that he dismisses is a nullity. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Merrill v. Dearing
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Oct 5, 1877
Citation: 24 Minn. 179
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.