25306 | 9th Cir. | Jun 3, 1971
442 F.2d 1350" date_filed="1971-06-03" court="9th Cir." case_name="Merle Don Rothman, Trustee v. John F. Forbes & Co.">442 F.2d 1350
Merle Don ROTHMAN, Trustee, Appellant,
v.
JOHN F. FORBES & CO., Claimant, Appellee.
No. 25306.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 3, 1971.
Richard S. Berger (argued), Bernard Shapiro, of Gendel, Raskoff, Shapiro & Quittner, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
On review here are two items of accountants' fees in the amounts of $2,413.35 and $4,117.85 as allowed preferences in bankruptcy proceedings.
We find the allowance of the $2,413.35 was clearly erroneous, which appellee virtually concedes.
We cannot find the award of $4,117.85 was clearly erroneous.
Remanded for a modification consistent herewith.