History
  • No items yet
midpage
Merkel v. Lazard
109 N.Y.S. 577
N.Y. App. Div.
1908
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

On a prior appeal by the defendants from a judgment entered upon a direction of verdict in favor of plaintiff this court held the facts proved raised a .question for the jury and reversed the judgment and directed a new trial (114 App. Div. 25). On such new trial the learned trial court granted a nonsuit and the plaintiff appeals.. No new facts were developed on the second trial justifying such a disposition of the case. The witnesses Mueeke.and Frankenhauser were examined in greater detail on the last trial hut nothing new as to their course of dealing or as to the manner in which their checks were, drawn was developed, Qur former decision remains the law of the case and should be *935followed by the trial court. That decision determined that the proofs made a . question of fact clearly pointed for a jury to pass upon. The nonsuit was improper and the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present—Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Lauglilin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ. Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Case Details

Case Name: Merkel v. Lazard
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 15, 1908
Citation: 109 N.Y.S. 577
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.