Meredith v. CommonwealthMeredith v. Commonwealth
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Gant
This appeal is from a conviction of assault in the second degree,
The jury was instructed on both second degree and third degree assault, finding the appellant guilty of the former and fixing his punishment at five years.
(1) A person is guilty of assault in the second degree when;
* * * * * *
(b) He intentionally causes physical injury to another by means of a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument . ..
In an excellent argument, appellant contends that the superficial wound herein does not constitute a “physical injury” as defined in
There is no evidence herein that the prosecuting witness suffered any substantial pain, leaving us to an interpretation of the phrase “any impairment of physical condition,” as used in the statute. Judge Learned Hand once wrote, “... Words are chameleons, which reflect the color of their environment.”
The definition of “serious physical injury,” as it pertains to the impairment necessary to constitute such injury, in KRS 500.-080(15) speaks of “prolonged impairment of health, or prolonged ... impairment of the function of any bodily organ.” Contrasting this “prolonged impairment of health ” with “any impairment of physical condition,” we feel that the color of the environment of these latter words would be apparent even to one suffering from achromatopsia. The same phrase, “any impairment of physical condition,” would be included in third degree assault, a misdemeanor, and without it there could be no assault that did not involve a grievous injury.
It is our opinion that when a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument is used intentionally, the requirements of
We further find that the other assignments of error are without merit.
The judgment is affirmed.
All concur.